
Cited
references were chosen to be representative, accessible overviews. However, the
reference list provided should not be considered exhaustive. For full citation
lists, consult the printed or online version of the Gaussian 03 User's Reference.
New Chemistry Enhanced ONIOM Method The ONIOM facility
in Gaussian 03 has been significantly enhanced over that offered by Gaussian
98 [1-2]: -
The ONIOM facility [42] now supports electronic
embedding for ONIOM(MO:MM) calculations: the electrostatic properties of the MM
region can be taken into account during computations on the QM region. -
ONIOM(MO:MM) optimizations are much faster and can be reliably performed for large
molecules (e.g., proteins). The algorithmic improvements include:
-
A quadratic coupled algorithm takes into account the coupling between
atoms using internal coordinates (typically, those in the model system) and those
in Cartesian coordinates (typically, the atoms only in the MM layer), resulting
in more accurate steps. -
MO/MM optimizations perform micro-iterations
for the atoms only in the MM layer between traditional optimization steps on the
real system, resulting in faster and more reliable optimizations. Electronic embedding
can be combined with micro-iterations. -
Analytic frequencies
are available for ONIOM(MO:MM) calculations, and frequencies for ONIOM(MO:MO)
calculations are significantly faster. -
Gaussian 03 provides support
for general molecular mechanics (MM) force fields, including read-in and modified
parameters. A standalone MM optimization program is also included. -
Support for an external program for any ONIOM model (e.g., an external MM
program may be used). Solvent Effects
The Polarizable Continuum Model (PCM) solvation method has been improved and extended
[3-8]: -
The IEFPCM model [3,9] is now the default, and analytic
frequencies are now available for this SCRF method. Additional performance improvements
include a new cavity generation technique [10]. -
Many additional
properties can be modeled in solution (discussed later in this brochure).
Periodic Boundary Conditions (PBC) Gaussian 03 offers PBC
calculations for studying periodic systems: e.g., polymers, surfaces and crystals
[12-15]. PBC calculations solve the Schrödinger equation subject to the boundary
condition that the molecule and the wavefunction repeat indefinitely in one, two
or three directions. Hartree-Fock and DFT energies and gradients are available
for periodic systems. Molecular Dynamics Dynamics calculations
can provide qualitative understanding of reaction mechanisms and quantitative
details about the reaction such as product distributions. There are two main approaches
to performing these calculations: -
In Born-Oppenheimer Molecular
Dynamics (BOMD), classical trajectories are calculated on a local quadratic approximation
to the potential energy surface (for a review, see [16]). Our implementation [17]
uses a Hessian-based algorithm for the predictor and corrector steps, an approach
which results in a factor of 10 or more improvement in the step size over previous
implementations. While it can make use of analytic second derivatives, BOMD is
available for all theoretical methods having analytic gradients. -
Gaussian 03 also offers Atom-Centered Density Matrix Propagation (ADMP)
method [18-20] molecular dynamics (available for Hartree-Fock and DFT). Drawing
on the work of Car and Parrinello [21], ADMP propagates the electronic degrees
of freedom rather than solving the SCF equations at each nuclear geometry. Unlike
CP, ADMP propagates the density matrix rather than the MOs. This is much more
efficient if an atom-centered basis set is being used. This approach overcomes
some limitations inherent in the CP implementation: e.g., there is no need to
substitute D for H in order to maintain energy conservation, and both pure and
hybrid DFT functionals can be used. ADMP calculations can also be performed in
the presence of a solvent [22], and ADMP can be used in ONIOM(MO:MM) calculations.
Excited States There are additions and several enhancements to
excited states methods: -
CASSCF calculations are now more efficient
due to a new algorithm for evaluating the CI-vector in the full configuration
interaction calculation [23]. Practical active spaces increase to about 14 orbitals
for energies and gradients (they remain at about 8 orbitals for frequencies). -
The Restricted Active Space (RAS) SCF method [24] is also available[25]. RASSCF
calculations partition the molecular orbitals into five sections: the lowest lying
occupieds (considered inactive in the calculation), the RAS1 space of doubly occupied
MOs, the RAS2 space containing the most important orbitals for the problem, the
RAS3 space of weakly occupied MOs and the remaining unoccupied orbitals (also
treated as frozen by the calculation). Thus, the active space in CASSCF calculations
is divided into three parts in a RAS calculations, and allowed configurations
are defined by specifying the minimum number of electrons that must be present
in the RAS1 space and the maximum number that must be in the RAS3 space, in addition
to the total number of electrons in the three RAS spaces. -
NBO
orbitals for may be used for defining CAS and RAS active spaces. These provide
good initial guesses for the required antibonding orbitals which correlate with
the bonds/lone pairs of interest. -
The Symmetry Adapted Cluster/Configuration
Interaction (SAC-CI) method of Nakatsuji and coworkers is now included in Gaussian.
This method has many uses: predicting very accurate excited states of organic
systems, studying two-to-many electron excitation processes such as the shake-up
in the ionization spectrum, and other problem types. For an overview of the SAC-CI
method, see [26-27]. -
Solvent Effects: Excited states can be modeled
in the presence of a solvent [28-29] using the CI-Singles and Time Dependent Hartree-Fock
and DFT methods. Molecular Properties Gaussian 03
provides many new molecular properties: -
Spin-spin coupling constants
[31-34], which can aid in distinguishing conformations in magnetic spectra. -
g tensors and other hyperfine spectra tensors [49-52]. Gaussian 03
can produce nuclear electric quadrupole constants, rotational constants, the quartic
centrifugal distortion terms, the electronic spin rotation terms, the nuclear
spin rotation terms, the dipolar hyperfine terms and Fermi contact terms. All
tensors can be exported to Pickett's fitting and spectral analysis program [53]. -
Harmonic vibration-rotation coupling [43-44]: A spectroscopic property dependent
on the coupling between molecules' vibrational and rotational modes. It is used
to analyze detailed rotational spectra. -
Anharmonic vibration
and vibration-rotation coupling [44-48]: Using perturbation theory, these higher
order terms are incorporated into frequency calculations in order to produce more
accurate results. -
Pre-resonance Raman spectra which yield information
about ground state structures, connectivity, and vibrational states. -
Optical Rotations/Optical Rotary Dispersion: Used to distinguish enantiomers
of chiral systems [39-41] (this property is computed via GIAOs). -
Electronic Circular Dichroism (ECD): This property is the differential absorption
in the visible and ultraviolet regions for optically active molecules, and is
used to assign absolute configurations [35-36]. Predicted spectra can also be
useful in interpreting existing ECD data and peak assignments. -
Frequency-dependent polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities, which can be used
to study how the molecular properties of materials vary with wavelength of the
incident light [37-38]. -
Magnetic susceptibilities computed with
Gauge-Independent Atomic Orbitals (GIAOs) [30]. This property is the magnetic
analogue to the electric polarizability, and it provides insight into the diamagnetic
vs. paramagnetic character of molecules. -
Solvent Effects: Electric
and magnetic properties and the various spectra can be predicted for systems in
solution as well as ones in the gas phase [54-56]. -
Properties
with ONIOM: The ONIOM method may be used with these electric and magnetic properties.
Fundamental Algorithms -
Much Better Initial Guesses: Gaussian
03 uses the Harris functional for generating initial guesses. This functional
[59] is a non-iterative approximation to DFT, and it produces initial guesses
which are better than those produced by Gaussian 98: for example, there are modest
improvements for organic systems but very substantial improvements for compounds
containing metals. -
New SCF Convergence Algorithm: The default
SCF algorithm now uses a combination of two Direct Inversion in the Iterative
Subspace (DIIS) extrapolation methods EDIIS and CDIIS. EDIIS [58] uses energies
for extrapolation, and it dominates the early iterations of the SCF convergence
process. CDIIS, which performs extrapolation based on the commutators of the Fock
and density matrices, handles the latter phases of SCF convergence. This new algorithm
is very reliable, and previously troublesome SCF convergence cases now almost
always converge with the default algorithm. For the few remaining pathological
convergence cases, Gaussian 03 offers Fermi broadening and damping in combination
with CDIIS (including automatic level shifting). -
Density Fitting
for Pure DFT Calculations: Gaussian 03 provides the density fitting approximation
[60,61] for pure DFT calculations. This approach expands the density in a set
of atom-centered functions when computing the Coulomb interaction instead of computing
all of the two-electron integrals. It provides significant performance gains for
pure DFT calculations on medium sized systems too small to take advantage of the
linear scaling algorithms without a significant degradation in accuracy. Gaussian
03 can generate an appropriate fitting basis automatically from the AO basis,
or you may select one of the built-in fitting sets. -
Faster and
Automated FMM: The fast multipole method (FMM) in Gaussian 98 allowed the
computational cost for large DFT calculations to scale linearly with system size.
In Gaussian 03, improvements to these algorithms [57] means that their
performance gains can be realized for systems of more modest size as well (~100
atoms for pure DFT calculations and ~150 atoms with hybrid functionals). In addition,
this feature is now fully automated: the program invokes FMM automatically when
appropriate. -
Coulomb Engine: Gaussian 03 incorporates
a faster algorithm for the Coulomb operator for pure DFT calculations. The Coulomb
engine produces the exact Coulomb matrix without explicitly forming four center
two electron integrals. This substantially reduces the CPU time for the Coulomb
problem in pure DFT calculations. -
O(N) Exact Exchange:
A new algorithm for Hartree-Fock and DFT calculations using hybrid functionals
implements screening of the exact exchange contribution via the density matrix
to eliminate the many zero value terms [62]. This technique results in a linear
computational cost for these methods without accuracy loss.
Additional FeaturesReferences
| 1 | T.
Vreven, K. Morokuma, Ö. Farkas, H. B. Schlegel, and M. J. Frisch, J. Comp. Chem.
in press (2003). | | 2 | T.
Vreven, I. Komáromi, S. Dapprich, K. S. Byun, J. A. Montgomery Jr., K. Morokuma,
and M. J. Frisch, in prep. (2003). | | 3 | B.
Mennucci, E. Cancès, and J. Tomasi, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 10506 (1997). |
| 4 | B.
Mennucci and J. Tomasi, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 5151 (1997). |
| 5 | M.
Cossi, N. Rega, G. Scalmani and V. Barone, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 5691 (2001). |
| 6 | M.
Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, and V. Barone, J. Chem Phys. 117, 43 (2002). |
| 7 | M.
Cossi, N. Rega, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, J. Comp. Chem. in press (2003). |
| 8 | G.
Scalmani, V. Barone, K. N. Kudin, C. S. Pomelli, G. E. Scuseria, and M. J. Frisch,
Theo. Chem. Acc., submitted (2003). | | 9 | E.
Cancès and B. Mennucci, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 4744 (2001). |
| 10 | G.
Scalmani, N. Rega, M. Cossi and V. Barone, in prep. (2003). |
| 12 | K.
N. Kudin and G. E. Scuseria, Chem. Phys. Lett. 289, 611 (1998). |
| 13 | K.
N. Kudin and G. E. Scuseria, Chem. Phys. Lett. 283, 61 (1998). |
| 14 | K.
N. Kudin and G. E. Scuseria, Phys. Rev. B 61, 16440 (2000). |
| 15 | O.
V. Yazyev, K. N. Kudin, and G. E. Scuseria, Phys. Rev. B 65, art. no. 205117 (2002). |
| 16 | K.
Bolton, W. L. Hase, and G. H. Peshlherbe, in Modern Methods for Multidimensional
Dynamics Computation in Chemistry, Ed. D. L. Thompson (World Scientific, Singapore,
1998) 143. | | 17 | J.
M. Millam, V. Bakken, W. Chen, W. L. Hase, and B. H. Schlegel, J. Chem. Phys.
111, 3800 (1999). | | 18 | H.
B. Schlegel, J. M. Millam, S. S. Iyengar, G. A. Voth, A. D. Daniels, G. E. Scuseria,
and M. J. Frisch, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 9758 (2001). |
| 19 | S.
S. Iyengar, H. B. Schlegel, J. M. Millam, G. A. Voth, G. E. Scuseria, and M. J.
Frisch, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 10291 (2001). | | 20 | H.
B. Schlegel, S. S. Iyengar, X. Li, J. M. Millam, G. A. Voth, G. E. Scuseria, and
M. J. Frisch, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 8694 (2002). |
| 21 | R.
Car and M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2471 (1985). |
| 22 | N.
Rega, S. S. Iyengar, G. A. Voth, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, and M. J. Frisch,
in prep. (2003). | | 23 | M.
Klene, M. A. Robb, M. J. Frisch, and P. Celani, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 5653 (2000). |
| 24 | J.
Olsen, B. O. Roos, P. Jorgensen, and H. J. A. Jensen, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 2185
(1988). | | 25 | M.
Klene, M. A. Robb, L. Blancafort, and M. J. Frisch, in prep (2003). |
| 26 | H.
Nakatsuji, in Computational Chemistry-Reviews of Current Trends, Ed. J. Leszcynski,
Vol. 2 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997) 62-124. |
| 27 | M.
Ehara, M. Ishida, K. Toyota, and H. Nakatsuji, in Reviews in Modern Quantum Chemistry,
Ed. K. D. Sen (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002) 293. |
| 28 | B.
Mennucci, R. Cammi, and J. Tomasi, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 2798 (1998). |
| 29 | M.
Cossi and V. Barone, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 4708 (2001). |
| 30 | K.
Ruud, T. Helgaker, K. L. Bak, P. Jorgensen, and H. J. A. Jensen, J. Chem. Phys.
99, 3847 (1993). | | 31 | V.
Sychrovsky, J. Grafenstein, and D. Cremer, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 3530 (2000). |
| 32 | T.
Helgaker, M. Watson, and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9402 (2000). |
| 33 | V.
Barone, J. E. Peralta, R. H. Contreras, and J. P. Snyder, J. Phys. Chem. A 106,
5607 (2002). | | 34 | J.
E. Peralta, R. H. Contreras, J. R. Cheeseman, M. J. Frisch, and G. E. Scuseria,
in prep. (2003). | | 35 | K.
L. Bak, P. Jorgensen, T. Helgaker, K. Ruud, and H. J. A. Jensen, J. Chem. Phys.
98, 8873 (1993). | | 36 | J.
Autschbach, T. Ziegler, S. J. A. van Gisbergen, and E. J. Baerends, J. Chem. Phys.
116, 6930 (2002). | | 37 | J.
E. Rice and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 4959 (1991). |
| 38 | J.
E. Rice and N. C. Handy, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 43, 91 (1992). |
| 39 | T.
Helgaker, K. Ruud, K. L. Bak, P. Jorgensen, and J. Olsen, Faraday Discuss. 99,
165 (1994). | | 40 | P.
J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, J. R. Cheeseman, M. J. Frisch, and C. Rosini, Organic
Letters 4, 4595 (2002). | | 41 | P.
J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, J. R. Cheeseman, M. J. Frisch, O. Bortolini, and P.
Besse, Chirality 14, (2002). | | 42 | S.
Dapprich, I. Komáromi, K. S. Byun, K. Morokuma, and M. J. Frisch, J. Mol. Struct.
(Theochem) 462, 1 (1999). | | 43 | W.
H. Miller, in Potential Energy Surfaces and Dynamical Calculations, Ed. D. G.
Truhlar (Plenum, New York, 1981) 265. | | 44 | V.
Barone, J. Comp. Chem. in prep. (2003). | | 45 | W.
H. Miller, N. C. Handy, and J. E. Adams, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 99 (1980). |
| 46 | D.
A. Clabo, W. D. Allen, R. B. Remington, Y. Yamaguchi, and H. F. Schaefer III,
Chemical Physics 123, 187 (1988). | | 47 | C.
Minichino and V. Barone, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 3717 (1994). |
| 48 | V.
Barone and C. Minichino, Theochem 330, 365 (1995). |
| 49 | R.
F. Curl Jr., Mol. Phys. 9, 585 (1965). | | 50 | J.
Gauss, K. Ruud, and T. Helgaker, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 2804 (1996). |
| 51 | V.
Barone, Chem. Phys. Lett. 262, 201 (1996). |
| 52 | F.
Neese, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 11080 (2001). | | 53 | H.
M. Pickett, J. Mol. Spec. 148, 371 (1991). |
| 54 | J.
Tomasi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Cappelli, and S. Corni, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
4, 5697 (2002). | | 55 | B.
Mennucci, J. Tomasi, R. Cammi, J. R. Cheeseman, M. J. Frisch, F. J. Devlin, S.
Gabriel, and P. J. Stephens, J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 6102 (2002). |
| 56 | C.
Cappelli, S. Corni, B. Mennucci, R. Cammi, and J. Tomasi, J. Phys. Chem. A 106,
12331 (2002). | | 57 | K.
N. Kudin and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 2351 (1999). |
| 58 | K.
N. Kudin, G. E. Scuseria, and E. Cancès, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 8255 (2002). |
| 59 | J.
Harris, Phys. Rev. B. 31, 1770 (1985). | | 60 | B.
I. Dunlap, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 3140 (1983). |
| 61 | B.
I. Dunlap, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 529, 37 (2000). |
| 62 | J.
C. Burant, K. Kudin, G. E. Scuseria, G. W. Trucks, and M. J. Frisch, in prep.
(2003). | | 63 | M.
Douglas and N. M. Kroll, Ann. Phys. (NY) 82, 89 (1974). |
| 64 | B.
A. Hess, Phys. Rev. A 32, 756 (1985). | | 65 | B.
A. Hess, Phys. Rev. A 33, 3742 (1986). | | 66 | G.
Jansen and B. A. Hess, Phys. Rev. A 39, 6016 (1989). |
| 67 | M.
Barysz and A. J. Sadlej, Theochem 573, 181 (2001). |
| 68 | W.
A. deJong, R. J. Harrison, and D. A. Dixon, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 48 (2001). |
| 69 | N.
C. Handy and A. J. Cohen, Mol. Phys. 99, 403 (2001). |
| 70 | J.
P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996). |
| 71 | J.
P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997). |
| 72 | A.
D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 1040 (1996). |
| 73 | T.
Van Voorhis and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 400 (1998). |
| 74 | A.
D. Boese and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 5497 (2001). |
| 75 | H.
L. Schmider and A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 9624 (1998). |
| 76 | F.
A. Hamprecht, A. J. Cohen, D. J. Tozer, and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 6264
(1998). | | 77 | P.
J. Wilson, T. J. Bradley, and D. J. Tozer, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 9233 (2001). |
| 78 | L.
A. Curtiss, K. Raghavachari, P. C. Redfern, V. Rassolov, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem
Phys. 109, 7764 (1998). | | 79 | L.
A. Curtiss, P. C. Redfern, K. Raghavachari, V. Rassolov, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem.
Phys. 110, 4703 (1999). | | 80 | S.
Parthiban and J. M. L. Martin, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 6014 (2001). |
| 81 | J.
M. L. Martin and G. de Oliveira, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 1843 (1999). |
| 82 | E.
V. R. de Castro and F. E. Jorge, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 5225 (1998). |
| 83 | A.
D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 8554 (1997). |
| 84 | J.
A. Montgomery Jr., M. J. Frisch, and J. M. L. Martin, in prep (2003). |
|